Drawing for TITAN

USPTO serial 90229176

TITAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BARRETT, LEAH N
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TITAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW D. SKALE

Andrew D. Skale MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROADSUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of an online non-downloadable software platform for the detection and mitigation of cybersecurity incidents for others; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing responses to cybersecurity incidents for others; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for remediation of cybersecurity incidents for others; Computer security consulting, advisory and management of computer security services in the nature of managing and responding to cybersecurity threats, namely, restricting unauthorized access to computer networks; managing investigating, and analyzing cybersecurity incidents and data breaches for others; collecting, analyzing and monitoring technical, computer, and network data to identify potential cybersecurity events, risks, and improvements for others; analyzing cybersecurity data using artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine learning software and algorithms for others; development and engineering of computer software systems to monitor, analyze and report on cybersecurity related events for others; performing computer security threat analysis for protecting data for others; penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability for others; assessments of IT applications, systems, infrastructure, and computer networks to assess information security vulnerability for others; analysis of cybersecurity performance, vulnerabilities, and risk for othersACTIVESep 29, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 11, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 2, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 2, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 8, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 8, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 8, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 8, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 16, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance