Drawing for COVERED STRAPLESS FACEWEAR

USPTO serial 90230562

COVERED STRAPLESS FACEWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LIU, PHILIP HUAI-EN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COVERED STRAPLESS FACEWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Hatfield

Kathryn Hatfield HATFIELD SCHWARTZ LAW GROUP240 CEDAR KNOLLS ROADCEDAR KNOLLS, NJ 07927UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Face coverings being sanitary masks for protection against viral infectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 7, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2020MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance