USPTO serial 90232775
COTTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, KELLY CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COTTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
zhang, weibo
13668 ROOSEVELT AVE, SUITE 717FLUSHING, NY 11354UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cups; Dinnerware; Containers for household or kitchen use; Crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; Disposable dinnerware, namely, plates; Drinking glasses; Drinking vessels; Electric devices for attracting and killing insects; Electric hot combs; Electric tooth brushes; Electric toothbrush replacement heads; Grooming tools for pets, namely, combs and brushes; Kettles, non-electric; Make-up brushes; Make-up removing appliances; Non-electric coffee makers; Non-electric food blenders; Oven mitts; Paper and plastic cups; Tooth brushes; Wine openers; Works of art made of porcelain | ACTIVE | May 20, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |