USPTO serial 90233537
DRUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca Liebowitz
Rebecca Liebowitz VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; cosmetic soaps; cosmetic preparations for face and body care; non medicated skin care preparations; non-medicated preparations for face and body care, non-medicated facial care preparations; cosmetics, namely, creams, cleansers, toners, serums, masks, oils, milks, lotions, gels, lotions and powders for the face, the body and the hands, and foundations,; sun-tanning preparations for cosmetic use, non-medicated sunscreen creams, non-medicated sunscreen lotions, non-medicated sun care preparations, non-medicated after-sun preparations; make-up; nail cosmetics, foaming cosmetics for feet and hands, and make-up; make-up, namely, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balms, eye shadow, cheek blush, face foundation, concealers, face powder, eye liner, mascara; eyebrow cosmetics; make-up removing preparations; beauty masks; cotton pads for cosmetic purposes; hair shampoos and conditioners; hair curling preparations; non-medicated balms for hair styling; hair lacquers; color-removing preparations for hair; hair coloring and hair decoloring preparations; hair dyes; hair masks; non-medicated hair treatments and hair care preparations; gels, sprays, toner, mousses and balms for hair styling and hair care; permanent waving and curling preparations for the hair; hair detangling, oils, non-medicated serums for capillary treatments, baby products, men's products, eye cream, products for lashes; perfume; eaux de toilette, eaux de cologne, after-shave, personal deodorants, body deodorants, antiperspirants; cosmetic preparations for baths; gels and salts for the bath and the shower, not for medical purposes, non-medicated toiletry preparations, toilet soaps; essential oils; toothpaste and mouthwashes, not for medical purposes; shaving preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 12998131 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Manon and Amir Hussein Family Trust
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DRUIDE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |