USPTO serial 90237619
JUMPCUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUMPCUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles R Halloran
Charles R Halloran KPPB LLP2190 S TOWNE CENTRE PL STE 300ANAHEIM, CA 92806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MARKETING ANALYSIS SERVICES; MEDIA PLANNING SERVICES; MARKET RESEARCH AND MARKET INTELLIGENCE SERVICES; BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICES; ANALYSIS OF MARKET RESEARCH DATA AND STATISTICS; ANALYSIS OF MARKET RESEARCH DATA AND STATISTICS FEATURING MARKET AND DATA ANALYTICS, SEGMENTATION, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CURATION SERVICES INVOLVING MEDIA ANALYSIS; BUSINESS MARKETING AND ANALYSIS OF MARKET RESEARCH DATA SERVICES FEATURING MARKET AND DATA ANALYTICS, SEGMENTATION, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CURATION SERVICES INVOLVING MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION SHOWS AND MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | MEDIA PRODUCTION SERVICES, namely, AUDIO, VIDEO AND FILM PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS; MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION; FILM, VIDEO AND AUDIO PRODUCTION CONSULTING SERVICES; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF DEVELOPMENT, CREATION, PRODUCTION AND POST-PRODUCTION SERVICES OF MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT; CREATING AND DEVELOPING CONCEPTS FOR TELEVISION PROGRAMS, MOTION PICTURE FILMS, VIDEO PROGRAMS, AUDIO PROGRAMS AND MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT; PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO TELEVISION, MOTION PICTURE FILM, VIDEO PROGRAMS, AUDIO PROGRAMS, AND MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT PRODUCTION; SCREENPLAY WRITING; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF DEVELOPMENT, CREATION, PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, AND POST-PRODUCTION OF MOTION PICTURES, TELEVISION SHOWS, AUDIO PROGRAMS, AND MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |