USPTO serial 90242530
TOP SHELF CBD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOP SHELF CBD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK P. WALTERS
MARK P. WALTERS LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC1325 FOURTH AVENUESUITE 1130SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical byproducts of the processing of hemp, namely, natural resins comprised of CBD from hemp; chemical extracts from hemp in the form of chemical preparations comprised of CBD; Chemical preparations in the nature of concentrated and isolated cannabidiol (CBD); all of the aforementioned solely derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, and all of the foregoing not for use in consumable, therapeutic, or medicinal goods, and all of the foregoing for use in the manufacture of non-medicated personal care and cosmetic compositions, none of the foregoing to include end consumer cosmetics, skincare, haircare, or other beauty products | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | Concentrated and refined plant extracts being cannabidiol (CBD) isolate derived soley from hemp with not more than 0.3 percent delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on a dry weight basis, sold as a component ingredient in non-medicated cosmetics and not for use in consumable, therapeutic, or medicinal goods, none of the foregoing to include end consumer cosmetics, skincare, haircare, or other beauty products | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Semi-Processed natural resins comprised of CBD from hemp, all of the aforementioned derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and all of the foregoing not for use in consumable, therapeutic, or medicinal goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | Chemical treatment of hemp; extraction of chemicals from hemp; chemical processing of hemp; all of the aforementioned for cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis and all of the foregoing not for the manufacture of consumable, therapeutic, or medicinal goods containing hemp CBD | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Podworks Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Podworks Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named TOP SHELF CBD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2023 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2023 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |