Drawing for E11EVEN

USPTO serial 90242538

E11EVEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHUPATHI, TARA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E11EVEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew Wilson

Matthew Wilson PEDERSEN & HOUPT, PC161 N. CLARK ST., SUITE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Day club servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2022PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 4, 2022PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 28, 2022APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 10, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 2, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance