Drawing for WE ARE HUMAN

USPTO serial 90244262

WE ARE HUMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE ARE HUMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin S. White

Benjamin S. White IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate MallSuite 200San Diego, CA 92121

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable application software for desktop computers, handheld computers, smart phones, embedded computer systems, namely, software for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerce; Downloadable computer software and hardware for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerce; Downloadable cloud computing software for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerce; Downloadable cloud-based software for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerce; Downloadable computer software for fraud activity detection in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerceACTIVE—
042Computer security threat analysis in the nature of fraud detection for protecting data in the fields of computer security, computer networks security, banking, and online advertising and commerceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2023NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Mar 13, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2022IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Nov 10, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 6, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 6, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 15, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 8, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance