USPTO serial 90249864
TRUMASK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRELL, STEVEN WAYNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUMASK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BOULEVARDSUITE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Dust masks; Dust protective goggles and masks; Filters for non-medical respiratory masks; Non-medical respiratory mask filters; Protective face masks for the prevention of accident or injury; Protective face masks for the prevention of accident or injury that filter at least 95 percent of airborne particles and are not resistant to oil; Protective industrial face masks; Protective industrial respiratory masks; Respiratory masks for the prevention of accident or injury; Oil-proof protective face masks for the prevention of accident or injury that filter at least 95 percent of airborne particles; Oil-resistant protective face masks for the prevention of accident or injury that filter at least 95 percent of airborne particles | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Aerosol masks for medical use; Anesthesia masks; Anesthetic masks; Disposable sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; Extenders for sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; Face coverings being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; Face covers being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; Face masks for use by dental care providers; Face masks for use by health care providers; Masks for use by medical personnel; Pediatric breathing masks for medical purposes; Personal protective equipment (PPE), namely, masks for use by medical personnel; Respiratory masks for medical purposes; Reusable sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; Sanitary masks for dental use; Sanitary masks for dust isolation for medical purposes; Sanitary masks for dust prevention for medical purposes; Sanitary masks for fungus isolation purposes; Sanitary masks for germ isolation purposes; Sanitary masks for medical wellness purposes; Sanitary masks for pollen isolation purposes; Sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; Sanitary masks for virus isolation purposes; Sanitary masks made of cloth for protection against viral infection; Surgical mask extenders; Surgical masks; Surgical masks that filter at least 95 percent of airborne particles and are not resistant to oil; Textile headgear specially adapted for use with medical ventilator mask interfaces; Fashion masks being sanitary masks for protection against viral infection; Sanitary masks for medical purposes; Sanitary masks for protection against viral infection that filter at least 95 percent of airborne particles and are not resistant to oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |