USPTO serial 90254764
NEXEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEXEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEREK FAHEY
DEREK FAHEY THE PLUS IP FIRM101 NE 3RD AVENUE, SUITE 1500FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, voice mail services, toll free telephone services in the nature of providing a dedicated toll-free number, visual voicemail and voicemail-to-email services, telephone call logging, caller ID Control and wireless PBX services; Voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) services, Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Trunking, IVR (Interactive Voice Response), automatic call recording, text messaging and multimedia messaging | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 2019 |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for customer relationship management; providing on-line nondownloadable software for personal and business contact management, and for communicating with customers, potential customers and business partners; providing on-line non-downloadable software for obtaining data and information about personal contacts and their companies for purposes of customer relationship management, sales, and marketing, and for managing, tracking, analyzing, and reporting data information in the fields of customer relationship management, sales, and marketing; providing on-line non-downloadable software for performing analytics and recommending actions in the field of CRM, sales, and marketing | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |