USPTO serial 90254905
KINESIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOX III, LYAL L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINESIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY H. TRONCO
LARRY H. TRONCO HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, issuing and payment processing services for credit and debit cards; financial consultation services in the field of cryptocurrency; funds investment services, namely, currency trading services; financial services for users of the internet, namely, financial analysis, online banking and online financial planning in the field of cryptocurrency; financial services relating to the trading of financial instruments, namely, online trading of financial instruments, precious metals and cryptocurrency; financial management of cryptocurrency; financial consultancy by investors to users of the internet in the field of cryptocurrency; financial information analysis, namely, compiling and analyzing statistics, data, and other sources of information for financial purposes in the field of cryptocurrency; providing financial information via a website in the field of cryptocurrency; Financial investment brokerage services in the field of cryptocurrency; providing financial information regarding financial markets and instruments in the field of cryptocurrency; financial consultancy in the field of cryptocurrency; Financial services, namely, providing for the exchange of cryptocurrency, commodities and financial derivatives via a global communications network; providing information in the fields of foreign currency, commodities and financial derivatives via a global communications network; precious metals brokerage, namely, financial investment brokerage services for precious metals; Cryptocurrency trading services, namely, financial brokerage services for cryptocurrency trading based on precious metals and electronic financial trading of cryptocurrency; Financial services relating to cryptocurrency, namely, financial brokerage services for cryptocurrency trading, cryptocurrency exchange services and cryptocurrency payment processing based on precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |