USPTO serial 90257089
PRONTO!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRONTO!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COMMUNIGATE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSING SA
GRAND-DUCHÉ DE LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by COMMUNIGATE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSING SA
COMMUNIGATE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSING SA
GRAND-DUCHÉ DE LUXEMBOURG, LU
Other trademarks owned by COMMUNIGATE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSING SA
Tiburon, CA
TIBURON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN A MENKES
JONATHAN A MENKES KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Unified communications as a Service (UCaaS) services featuring software platforms for providing telephony and telecommunications services; Off-site data backup services being telecommunications network datacenter services, including backup services for computer hard drive data, electronic data storage, electronic storage of documents and archived e-mails, electronic storage of electronic media, including images, text and audio data, electronic storage of files and documents, electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data, electronic storage services for archiving electronic data, off-site data backup, off-site data backup provided via the cloud, and temporary electronic storage of information; Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS) services and Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS) services, namely, cloud computing services in the nature of cloud-based software for use in enabling communications network services, business calling connectivity services, and computer software applications for enabling business communications for calls, messaging, collaboration, chat, and video over data networks; none of the foregoing in relation to enterprise resource planning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMUNIGATE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSING SA
- Other trademarks owned by COMMUNIGATE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSING SA
- Other trademarks owned by Stalker Software, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMUNIGATE INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRONTO!
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |