USPTO serial 90259133
ISARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS, KEISHA MONIQUE HARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ISARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Waterloo, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham Barclay Damon LLP160 Federal Street, Suite 1001Boston, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software providing crypto-agile and quantum safe security solutions in the nature of protecting against harvest and decrypt attacks, integrating cryptoagility into public key infrastructure and encryption in the fields of post-quantum encryption, quantum protected cybersecurity, quantum-safe cryptography, network monitoring, algorithms, data protection and system security | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for providing crypto-agile and quantum safe security solutions in the fields of post-quantum encryption, quantum protected cybersecurity, quantum-safe cryptography, network monitoring, algorithms, data protection and system security; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring software for providing crypto-agile and quantum safe security solutions in the nature of protecting against harvest and decrypt attacks, integrating cryptoagility into public key infrastructure and encryption in the fields of post-quantum encryption, quantum protected cybersecurity, quantum-safe cryptography, network monitoring, algorithms, data protection and system security; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for crypto-agile and quantum safe security solutions in the fields of post-quantum encryption, quantum protected cybersecurity, quantum-safe cryptography, network monitoring, algorithms, data protection and system security; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software for crypto-agile and quantum safe security solutions in the nature of protecting against harvest and decrypt attacks, integrating cryptoagility into public key infrastructure and encryption in the fields of post-quantum encryption, quantum protected cybersecurity, quantum-safe cryptography, network monitoring, algorithms, data protection and system security; Computer technology consultancy and technical support services in the fields of post-quantum encryption, quantum protected cybersecurity, quantum-safe cryptography, network monitoring, algorithms, data protection and system security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2026 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 1, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |