Drawing for MYBEEF

USPTO serial 90259492

MYBEEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYBEEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Costellia

Jeffrey L. Costellia NIXON PEABODY LLP799 9TH STREET N.W., SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018stirrup leathers; butts being parts of hides; leather wire; purses; valises; leather cord; leather straps; leather, unworked or semi-worked; shoulder belts in the nature of straps of leather; imitation leatherACTIVE—
029meat, namely, beef; beef meat-ball; beef meat-burger; beef cold cuts, beef charcuterie; condiments, namely, beef broth and beef bouillonACTIVE—
030thickening agents for cooking foodstuffs; flour; dough; sauces, condiments, namely, ketchup and pasta sauceACTIVE—
035commerce, and distribution, namely, retail stores, wholesale buying clubs, distributorships, and import-export agency featuring bovine meat, salted beef meat, preserved beef meat, canned beef meat, chilled canned beef meat, frozen and matured beef meat, especial cuts of beef meat, sauce beef meat, beef cold cuts and giblets, beef sausages, beef salami, meat and meat derivatives, namely, beefACTIVE—
039distribution, namely, delivery of goodsACTIVE—
040slaughtering of animals; food and drink preservation; food beneficiation; cereal beneficiationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2023TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 6, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2023PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 1, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2021ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 7, 2021PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 19, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 9, 2021ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 12, 2021PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 8, 2021CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 25, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2021PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance