Drawing for HAMMURABI LEGAL ANALYTICS

USPTO serial 90266459

HAMMURABI LEGAL ANALYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCARTHY, JOSEPH PATRICK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HAMMURABI LEGAL ANALYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip J. Foret

Philip J. Foret STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP30 VALLEY STREAM PARKWAYMALVERN, PA 19355UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer application software, namely, software for legal analytics for determining outcomes of legal filingsACTIVE—
042Legal analytics service, namely, data mining in the field of the law and legal filings; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for data analytics in the field of the law and legal filings; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring computer software that allow a litigant or potential litigant to perform analytics on outcomes of motions and other legal filings based on information in databases containing data, metrics, judicial profiles, law firm profiles, legal practitioner profiles, costs, and outcomes; cloud-based services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable computer software that allow a litigant or potential litigant to conduct analytics on outcomes of motions and other legal filings based on information in databases containing data, metrics, judicial profiles, law firm profiles, legal practitioner profiles, costs, and outcomes; and providing an interactive platform having online, non-downloadable computer software utilizing data analytics to optimize the selection of courts, to determine grantability potentials of motions, and to estimate the time to judicial decision on a legal filingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 24, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance