USPTO serial 90269605
TRUEFIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, JUSTIN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUEFIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marysville, WA
Marysville, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea M. Porterfield
Andrea M. Porterfield Polsinelli PC900 W. 48th Place, Suite 900Kansas City, MO 64112United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; Computer docking stations for authenticating the identify of a shooter and management of RFID and biometric scanners for use in firearm authentication, security, smart weapons technology; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers; downloadable authentication software, namely, software for authenticating the identify of a shooter and management of RFID and biometric scanners for use in firearm authentication, security, smart weapons technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching ancillary equipment to a firearm; firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching accessories to a firearm; triggers for firearms; smart guns featuring fingerprint recognition technology integrated into the grip; firearm authentication system, namely, a trigger lock for authentication using biometrics; universally adaptable biometric firearm trigger for both alternate electronics and mechanical systems that work in conjunction and also independently of a complete managed system; smart gun accessory solutions, namely, gun safety device which attaches to the firearm trigger to determine the handler's identity; Firearm triggers featuring biometric security technology; Gun safety device in the nature of a firearm trigger lock featuring a fingerprint recognition scanner to determine the handler's identity | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable cloud-based software for management of RFID and biometric scanner for use in firearm authentication, security, smart weapons technology; providing user identification authentication services using biometric hardware and software technology for use in verifying the identity of a handler of a firearm | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Identification verification services, namely, verification of personal identity for use in verifying the identity of a handler of a firearm for use in criminal and law enforcement investigations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Authgrip Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Authgrip Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TRUEFIRE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2023 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |