USPTO serial 90271376
SERPENTINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OEHRLEIN, STEFAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SERPENTINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cookeville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. BRETT HEAVNER
B. BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP901 NEW YORK AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric air heater, namely, electric air heater for residential and industrial use, all of the foregoing excluding use in baking and food preparation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |