USPTO serial 90275865
PLANTASTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLANTASTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine C. Miller
CATHERINE C. MILLER HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749ATTN: TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201-8749Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food, beverages and food substances for babies, namely, food for babies; food, beverages and food substances, namely, nutritional supplements; dietary and nutritional supplements; food for infants; infant formula | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Fruit purees; fruit-based snack food; vegetable purees; vegetable-based snack foods; fruit and vegetable purees; fruit and vegetable based snack foods; fresh packaged fruit chunks of apples; cooked vegetables; yogurt; drinking yogurts; yogurt based snack foods, namely, Greek yogurt, soy yogurt, custard style yogurt; fruit and vegetable purees with yogurt; Fruit and vegetable-based snack foods with yogurt; dairy-based snack foods; dairy products, namely, dairy-based dips; toddler meals, namely, packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, poultry, or vegetables; meat-based snack foods; meat substitutes; plant-based meat substitutes; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables; prepared meals consisting primarily of processed lentils, processed beans, processed peas, vegetable preparations for use as meat substitutes, plant-based meat substitutes, and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Breakfast cereal; prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; cereal-based snack foods; multigrain-based snack foods; crackers; cookies; grain based snack bars; grain-based organic snack foods; biscuits; corn-based snack foods; grain-based food bars also containing vitamins; grain-based snack foods; ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; puddings; pudding and fruit combination snack foods biscuits; pudding and fruit combination snack foods, namely, banana pudding; porridge | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |