Drawing for V VANTIS

USPTO serial 90277839

V VANTIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V VANTIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason R Jenkins

264 CENTENNIAL DRIVE, STOP 8196TWAMLEY HALL, ROOM 116GRAND FORKS, ND 58202-8196

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consulting in the field of integrating the utilization of unmanned aircraft into commercial, industrial, and business practices, for commercial purposes; business consulting in the field of operating unmanned aircraft both within and beyond visual line of sight; promoting public awareness of safety, privacy, and business opportunities in the field of unmanned aircraftACTIVE—
039Transport and delivery of goods and materials via unmanned aircraft both within and beyond visual line of sightACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, training pilots to operate unmanned aircraft; education services in the nature of providing classes, seminars and workshops for the public about safety, privacy, and employment opportunities in the field of unmanned aircraftACTIVE—
042Aerial inspection of improved and unimproved lands, real property, and public and private technical, industrial, and mechanical infrastructure via unmanned aircraft both within and beyond visual line of sight for purposes of gathering data in support of research and science objectives for advancing development of technical solutions; aerial inspection of energy generation and transmission facilities via unmanned aircraft both within and beyond visual line of sight for purposes of gathering data to enhance understanding of design and architecture to guide planning and development of these systems; aerial inspection of multi-modal transportation infrastructure via unmanned aircraft both within and beyond visual line of sight for purposes of gathering data to enhance understanding of architecture and guide planning and development of these systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 22, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 22, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance