USPTO serial 90281084
SYMPHONI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYMPHONI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen C. Kline
Karen C. Kline DUANE MORRIS LLP1875 NW CORPORATE BLVD, SUITE 300BOCA RATON, FL 33431United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automated machines, namely, packaging machines; material handling machines, namely, palletizers, case elevators, automatic pallet dispensing machines and automatic slip sheet dispensing machines; assembly line conveyor machinery; belt conveyors; industrial robots; machine parts, namely, molds for use in the manufacture of medical devices and parts therefor, automotive parts, and food products; dies for use with machine tools; metal working machines, namely, machining centers; numerically controlled machines and machine tools used for machining parts; multi-axis industrial robots; belts for conveyors, transmission shafts other than for land vehicles, pulleys being parts of machines, bearings as parts of machines, linear motors, permanent magnet motors, machine wheels, machine rollers coated with synthetic material, mechanical railed lifting conveyors; machine parts, namely, work holding fixtures for precision machining applications; power jig drills; power spindle drills; machine tools, namely, jaws clamps and vices all for use in the precision clamping of work pieces; lathes; gear cutters; broaches being machine tools, chasers being machine tools; industrial machines for assembling and packaging goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Automation systems and equipment, namely, electronic devices used to automatically locate, alter, inspect or test materials as part of automated processes using radio frequency; electronic interface equipment for machine tools to input or output computer numerical data; magnets for industrial purposes; magnetic encoded card readers; recording computer software and hardware for processing images and extracting data for analysis; downloadable factory automation software, namely, software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate distribution reports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |