Drawing for PURELITE

USPTO serial 90282222

PURELITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ONUOHA, UKACHUKWU FREDERICK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURELITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keri Sicard

Keri Sicard VIRTUAL IP LAW, LLC760 BEAN HILL ROADNORTHFIELD, NH 03276UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Perlite, also known as finely graded amorphous alumina silicate; perlite for use in particulate contaminant removal in recreational water, drinking water, beverages; perlite for use in parasite removal in liquids; perlite for use in agricultural liquid particulate separation; perlite for use in power and energy production, liquid cooling and transport processes for particulate contaminant removal; perlite for use in industrial chemical liquid processes for particulate contaminant removalABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2022MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Apr 25, 2022ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Apr 21, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2022ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 4, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 1, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 30, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 5, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 4, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 4, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 18, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 30, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance