USPTO serial 90282412
BREEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD B. BIAGI
RICHARD B. BIAGI NEAL & MCDEVITT, LLC2801 LAKESIDE DRIVESUITE 201BANNOCKBURN, IL 60015Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Oral sprays for the cessation of smoking; Nasal and oral spray preparations for use as central nervous system stimulants; Nutritional supplements in the form of tablets, gummies, sprays; none of the foregoing containing or derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis or containing THC or CBD | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Candies; Gummy candies; none of the foregoing containing or derived from cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis or containing THC or CBD | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Distribution services, namely, delivery of candies; Distribution services, namely, delivery of oral sprays; Distribution services, namely, delivery of nutritional supplements; Distribution services, namely, delivery of cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, herbs for smoking, smoking accessories; none of the foregoing featuring cannabis with a delta-9 THC concentration of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis or featuring THC or CBD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 19, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |