USPTO serial 90285298
AI/ROBOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAL, KAMAL SINGH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AI/ROBOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rajesh Fotedar
Rajesh Fotedar Cognition IP, P.C.201 Mission St.,Suite 1200San Francisco, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic motor controllers for the control of electric motors in commercial, industrial and consumer robotic devices other than for land vehicles; electronic controls for motors; assemblies and components for robotic devices and robotic vehicles, namely, microprocessor controlled systems being computer hardware, remote controls for telepresence robots, internal robotic networked systems being computer network bridges, internal wiring systems being electrical wires and networkable node-based sensor and electronic sensors for image capture or sensing external objects, and structural and hardware parts of telepresence robots; Intelligent Computer hardware and downloadable computer software systems for operating robotic devices and robotic vehicles; Downloadable computer software for remote operation, configuration, controlling, monitoring and management of robotic devices and robotic vehicles | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 1993 |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology information relating to the use of robotic devices and vehicles; Development of new technology for others in the fields of robotics, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, and computer science; Technical consultation in the field of robotics, namely, installation, maintenance and repair of computer software, hardware and software of computer systems for robotic devices and robotic vehicles; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users for remote operation, configuration, controlling, monitoring and management of robotic devices and robotic vehicles | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ai/Robotics Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ai/Robotics Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AI/ROBOTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |