USPTO serial 90286664
TH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODWIN, KATRINA JOYE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREA EVANS
ANDREA EVANS THE LAW FIRM OF ANDREA HENCE EVANS, LLC14625 BALTIMORE AVE. #853LAUREL, MD 20707UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hats; Shirts; Hoodies; Knit face masks being headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |