Drawing for TIGER KING

USPTO serial 90287519

TIGER KING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WLODARCZYK, CAROLYN A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIGER KING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Crawford

Christopher Crawford Crawford Law15 West La Rua StreetPensacola, FL 32501United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003After shave lotion, anti-aging moisturizer, blemish beauty cream, hydrating mask in the nature of skin moisturizer mask, oil free skin moisturizer, non-medicated skin care preparations in the nature of eye gel containing vitamin CACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2025PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 22, 2024PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 21, 2024APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 18, 2024ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Sep 2, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2024EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2024TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 4, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2024PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 4, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2024EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 16, 2024PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 21, 2023WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2023WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2023NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2023PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2023NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2023CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 7, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 28, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance