USPTO serial 90293890
SANYGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAUCETTE, MAX CLIFFORD STE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANYGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cote Saint-Luc, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ 1-800-4-TRADEMARK PAP.O. BOX 398538c/o TrademarkRenewals.comMIAMI BEACH, FL 33239Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Protective material lining for poles, door handles and carts, machinery and industrial equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |