USPTO serial 90300599
WHOLE PERSON INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHOLE PERSON INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rocky View County, AB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew W. Chu
Andrew W. Chu CRAFT CHU PLLC1204 Heights BoulevardHouston, TX 77008-6918United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation in the field of leadership development; Providing assessment services in the field of business leadership development, namely, asssessment of strategic and tactical business decisions, development, opportunities, and risks; Professional business consultancy; Business management and organization consultancy; Business management and organizational change management consultancy; Business management consulting in the fields of team development, organizational transformation, innovation and growth processes, and talent management and development strategies; Providing organizational effectiveness consulting in the field of team building; Business consulting services relating to the integration of the areas of business process technology, organizational learning, psychology, neuroscience, change management, and operational sustainability | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2023 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2023 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |