USPTO serial 90300718
STARR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARREN SCHWARTZ
6565 Crescent Park W306Playa Vista, CA 90094Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile application for enabling transmission of photographs; downloadable mobile application for the collection, organizing, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; downloadable mobile application which facilitates online access services for social networking, building social networking applications and for allowing data retrieval, upload, download, access and management; downloadable computer software to enable uploading, downloading, accessing, posting, displaying, tagging, blogging, streaming, linking, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information via computer and communication networks; downloadable mobile application platforms for application development and database management; all of the foregoing relating to a social media and content platform for high-profile celebrities | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Arranging subscriptions of the online publications of others for the purpose of allowing individuals to subscribe and access exclusive content uploaded by members of the service for entertainment and monetization purposes provided via a mobile application | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2023 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |