USPTO serial 90301674
CAN-DLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLANI, MAHREEN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAN-DLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEAKIN T. LAUER
DEAKIN T. LAUER KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP121 SW SALMON ST STE 1600ONE WORLD TRADE CENTERPORTLAND, OR 97204-2988Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Candle holders for use with beverage containers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |