Drawing for HAWK

USPTO serial 90303178

HAWK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAUCETTE, MAX CLIFFORD STE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAWK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL GREENBAUM

MICHAEL GREENBAUM BLANK ROME LLP1825 EYE STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009communications devices in the nature of electronic devices and software which establish and extend wireless network access, namely, wireless bridges and wireless nodesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2026MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2026ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 22, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 15, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 13, 2024NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2024PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Feb 12, 2024APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 4, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 4, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2024PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 28, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 14, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 5, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance