Drawing for BIOME BOOSTERS

USPTO serial 90307581

BIOME BOOSTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GANESH, HARINI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOME BOOSTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Cislo, Esq.

Daniel M. Cislo, Esq. CISLO & THOMAS LLP12100 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of COVID 19, Influenza, Autism, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Epstein-Barr VirusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 17, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 8, 2023GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2023GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2023CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 1, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 1, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2023JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 1, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 1, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 7, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 27, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 21, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance