USPTO serial 90312331
OUI CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRATOS, MARK STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OUI CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Castle Rock, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott D. Kumpf
SCOTT D. KUMPF KUMPF, CHARSLEY & HANSEN LLC9565 S. KINGSTON COURT, STE. 100ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bread baskets for domestic use; Bread baskets for household purposes; Bread boards; Cutting boards; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Kitchen containers; Kitchen utensil crocks; Wood chopping blocks; Wood chopping boards for kitchen use; Basting spoons; Basting spoons, for kitchen use; Charcuterie boards for serving and cutting charcuterie; Containers for household or kitchen use; Holder for cutting board; Ladles for kitchen use; Mortars and pestles for kitchen use | PARTIALLY PAID | Jan 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2021 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |