Drawing for M

USPTO serial 90316160

M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. Scott Gerien Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable user-defined content, namely, images, audio and video clips, texts, and Internet website links for customizing, posting, tagging and displaying via websites, on-line forums, chat rooms and blogs over the internetACTIVE—
035Brand consultancy services, namely, product brand development for corporate clients; providing brand development and brand strategic planning for marketing for othersACTIVE—
042Product packaging design; Website design development and integration services for third parties; graphic design services; computer software design consultancy, specifically, interface design consulting services; providing website technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; software design consultancy services for software interfaces and software design and development; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing and supporting customer relationship information, direct time entry, tracking, billing, and reporting, invoicing, and processing online payments for businesses and non-business organizations; custom software and graphic design services for the development of user-defined content for uploading, posting, tagging, and display of texts, links, images, audio and video clips, for use on websites, on-line forums, chat rooms and blogs over the Internet; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing and supporting customer relationship information, project management, task management, personal productivity, collaboration and communication between members of an organization and between the organization and its customers, suppliers, and partners, lead management and sales force automationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2024MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 12, 2024ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 11, 2024EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2024MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2024RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Jan 3, 2024APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 29, 2023ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT—
Nov 29, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 31, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2022GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2022GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2022CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 22, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance