USPTO serial 90317961
AUTONOMOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTONOMOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Perris, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Davis
Brian M. Davis VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 FAIRVIEW RD; SUITE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telepresence robots; Computer workstations comprising of integrated artificial intelligence computers and accessories, video display terminals, electronic telecommunications devices, audio and visual equipment and controls; Computer accessories, namely, computer monitor arms, holders and organizers in the nature of computer cable trays specially adapted for the management of computer cables; electrical power outlets | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Office furniture, namely, chairs and stools, desks, filing cabinets, plastic computer desk drawers, and desk privacy panels in the nature of furniture partitions; computer workstations comprising office desks with height controls | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2016 |
| 035 | Retail and online sale of office furniture and furniture accessories, robots and computer workstations comprising computer hardware components and furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |