USPTO serial 90318709
VOICE CLARIFYING CHAIR SPEAKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KETCHUM, BRENDAN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOICE CLARIFYING CHAIR SPEAKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spring Valley, CA
Spring Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Zimmermann
Michelle L. Zimmermann LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound amplifiers; headphones; earphones; earbuds; audio speakers; audio transmitter units; radio transmitters and receivers; electronic audio mixing apparatus offered as a component of sound amplifiers, headphones, earphones, earbuds, headsets for use with televisions, and audio speakers; apparatus for transmission of sound; audio speakers; audio transmitter units; radio transmitters and receivers; electronic audio mixing apparatus in the nature of audio mixers offered as a component of sound amplifiers and audio speakers; apparatus for transmission of sound; electronic audio mixing apparatus in the nature of audio mixers offered as a component of sound amplifiers, headphones, headsets for telephones, headsets for use with computers, televisions, portable communications devices and portable media players, and audio speakers; apparatus for transmission of sound; headsets, namely, headsets for telephones, headsets for use with computers, televisions, portable communications devices and portable media players, not for use in playing video games; aeronautical radio communication apparatus, namely, aeronautic headsets; communications headsets for use with communication radios, intercom systems, or other communications network transceivers; headphone, earphone, earbud and headset components, namely, microphones, audio receivers, amplifiers, electric volume control switches, audio speakers, and electronic audio mixing apparatus in the nature of audio mixers; integrated circuits; electronic audio mixing apparatus in the nature of audio mixers offered as a component of headphones, earphones, earbuds, headsets for telephones, headsets for use with computers, televisions, portable communications devices and portable media players, aeronautic headsets, and communications headsets for use with communication radios, intercom systems, or other communications network transceivers; a feature of headphones, earphones, earbuds and headsets, namely, microphones and electronic audio mixing apparatus in the nature of audio mixers; audio headphones; wireless headsets for use with televisions; television speakers; infrared audio headphones; televisions; television transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Hearing aids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TV Ears, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TV Ears, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named VOICE CLARIFYING CHAIR SPEAKERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |