CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PRONTO! RÉUNION

USPTO serial 90324239

PRONTO! RÉUNION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRONTO! RÉUNION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JONATHAN A. MENKES

JONATHAN A. MENKES KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring telecommunication software for live digital communications, namely, live video and audio conferencing with multiple simultaneous users, teleconferencing, network conferencing, web conferencing, text messaging, instant messaging, and videotexting; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring telecommunication software for uploading, downloading, sharing and archiving images, messages, audio, video, data and text content and files; none of the foregoing in relation to enterprise resource planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2023NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 28, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 18, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 14, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 14, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 14, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 17, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 14, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 12, 2021CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2021GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2021GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2021CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 19, 2021MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance