USPTO serial 90328541
PMDLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PMDLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Lee
David C. Lee AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP2001 K STREET N.W.ROBERT S. STRAUSS TOWERWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electrically-operated surface tools, namely, a rotating control device and pressure control valve with electric actuator which are controlled with software used to automatically manage wellbore pressure conditions and fluid circulation drilling oil and gas drilling operations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Oil and gas well drilling control device, namely, electric surface tool comprising a rotating control unit, pressure control valve, and electric actuator that are controlled by software to automatically manage wellbore pressure conditions and fluid circulation during oil and gas drilling operations; downloadable computer software for use in analyzing real-time data and automatically controlling valve positions of well drilling control devices based on predefined surface pressure | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring software used to monitor drilling well shut-in pressure and manage the influx or outflux of fluids from downhole formations by controlling the surface back pressure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |