Drawing for PAIN LETTER

USPTO serial 90330275

PAIN LETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOOR, AMIT KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAIN LETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES JUO

JAMES JUO THOMAS P. HOWARD LLC842 W. SOUTH BOULDER ROAD #100LOUISVILLE, CO 80027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic books in the field of human resources and career counselingACTIVE—
016Printed books in the field of human resources and career counselingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2026MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 23, 2026ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 23, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 10, 2026EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 24, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2023EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 13, 2023EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2023RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Oct 13, 2023RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2023RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Sep 7, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2023ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2023XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Sep 6, 2023XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2023GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 6, 2023GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jun 6, 2023CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 1, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 23, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance