USPTO serial 90330783
QUATERSAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, OLIVIA SUNMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUATERSAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chitosan-based polymers for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2021 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |