USPTO serial 90335159
SENTINEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENTINEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Brooks III
John J. Brooks III APTIMA, INC.12 GILL STREET SUITE 1400WOBURN, MA 01801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for health and safety monitoring in the nature of assessing physiological and enviornmental indicators to detect risk and produce predictive alerts for injusry prevention.; Downloadable computer software for safety monitoring in the nature of assessing physiological and enviornmental indicators to detect risk and produce predictive alerts for injusry prevention.; Recorded computer software for health and safety monitoring in the nature of assessing physiological and enviornmental indicators to detect risk and produce predictive alerts for injusry prevention.; Recorded computer software for safety monitoring in the nature of assessing physiological and enviornmental indicators to detect risk and produce predictive alerts for injusry prevention.; Downloadable cloud-based software for health and safety monitoring in the nature of assessing physiological and enviornmental indicators to detect risk and produce predictive alerts for injusry prevention.; Downloadable cloud-based software for safety monitoring in the nature of assessing physiological and enviornmental indicators to detect risk and produce predictive alerts for injusry prevention | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2023 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 11, 2023 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |