USPTO serial 90337194
ELEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACDOUGALL, KIERRA RYNNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy T. Wang
Timothy T. Wang NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC8140 WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 500DALLAS, TX 75231UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Beverages made of tea; biscuits; bread; cakes; coffee; cookies; granola-based snack bakery bars; ground coffee beans; Japanese green tea; muffins; chocolate-based beverages; pastries; roasted coffee beans; sandwiches; tea; unroasted coffee | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail bakery shops; Retail store services featuring food; Retail store services featuring coffee, tea, cocoa, packaged and prepared foods, housewares and kitchenware; Retail store services featuring non-electric coffee percolators, non-electric coffee pots, non-electric juicers, non-electric juice extractors, non-electric food blenders for household purposes, hand-operated coffee grinders, manually operated coffee mills, non-electrical coffee grinders, non-electric kettles, non-electric coffee makers, non-electric coffee brewers, electric coffee percolators, electric coffee machines, electric coffee brewers, electric coffee makers for household purposes, electric coffee mills, electric coffee roasters, electric coffee urns, electric coffee bean grinders, electric coffeemakers, electric espresso machines, electric food blenders, electric food blenders for household purposes, electric food processors, electric kettles, electric kettles for household purposes, electric juicers, electric juice extractors, electric milk frothers, paper coffee filters, electronic weighing scales for kitchen use, books, casual clothing, tote bags, cups and mugs, pitchers, water bottles, siphons and coffee drippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Café services; catering services; coffee shops; office coffee supply services; juice bar services; restaurant services; tea bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |