USPTO serial 90337422
TRUFRU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUFRU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pure Bright and Warm Cooperative
Goheung-gun, Jeonnam, KR
Pure Bright and Warm Cooperative
Goheung-gun, Jeonnam, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HUN JOON KIM
HUN JOON KIM LEX IP MEISTER, PLLC.5180 PARKSTONE DRIVE, SUITE 175CHANTILLY, VA 20151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit beverages; fruit juice; fruit-flavored beverages; fruit drinks; mixed fruit juice; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; non-alcoholic beverages containing vegetable juices; fruit-based beverages; vegetable juice beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |