USPTO serial 90345285
S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ANDREW T
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aurora, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Feeney
Alan Feeney PCK IP LAWYERS (USA) P.C.1717 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NORTH WESTSUITE 1025WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Electric cars, plug-in electric cars, self-propelled electric vehicles; Electric vehicles, namely, electric trucks, electric vans, electric three-wheeled vehicles, electric all terrain vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Charging of electric vehicles; Maintenance and repair of electric vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Rental of electric cars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 18, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |