USPTO serial 90345411
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London, Greater London, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra Summers
Alexandra Summers SAUSSER SUMMERS, PC4846 PAYTON STREETSANTA BARBARA, CA 93111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | The provision of online non-downloadable content management system (CMS) software for designing, building, publishing, maintaining and hosting websites; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; internet based application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analysing and maintaining the code, applications and software for websites of others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |