Drawing for ETPHTF

USPTO serial 90346797

ETPHTF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ETPHTF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rumit Ranjit Kankia

21750 Hardy Oak Blvd Ste 104KA IP Law PLLC, PMB 68590San Antonio, TX 78258-4946

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Dentifrice; Antiperspirants and deodorants for personal use; Bleaching salts; Body deodorants; Cleaning and polishing preparations; Cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; Ethereal oils; Hair colouring preparations; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sprays; Laundry detergents; Make-up preparations; Nail varnish; Non-medicated mouth washes; Polishing waxACTIVEOct 13, 2022

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 30, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 11, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 10, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 9, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 7, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 6, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 7, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 2, 2022SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 2, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 19, 2022IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 19, 2022EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 12, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2022WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2022WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 9, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 17, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 10, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance