USPTO serial 90347405
DLOTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DLOTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen City, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Blades for electric razors; Depilation appliances, electric and non-electric; Electric fingernail polishers; Electric hair crimper; Electric hair straightener; Electric manicure sets; Electric razors and electric hair clippers; Electric shavers; Electrolysis apparatus for hair removal; Eyelash curlers; Flatware, namely, forks, knives, and spoons; Gardening shears and scissors; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand tools, namely, drills; Hand tools, namely, files; Hand tools, namely, hammers; Hand tools, namely, pincers; Hand tools, namely, wrenches; Nail buffers for use in manicure; Nail nippers; Tool holders; Wrenches; Beard trimmers | ACTIVE | Nov 20, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2022 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |