Drawing for TRACKLET

USPTO serial 90354129

TRACKLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NITKIN, DINISHA F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRACKLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Justin G. Sanders

Justin G. Sanders Entralta P.C.2127 Olympic Parkway, Suite 1006 #367Chula Vista, CA,, 91915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for health screenings relating to COVID-19 and other infectious disease and for tracking and reporting health conditions and symptoms; Providing temporary use of web-based software applications for health screenings relating to COVID-19 and other infectious disease and for tracking and reporting health conditions and symptoms; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for health screenings relating to COVID-19 and other infectious disease and for tracking and reporting health conditions and symptomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 12, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2022NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2022PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2022PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance