USPTO serial 90356113
MINERVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLOTTI, CHRISTINA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINERVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oostrozebeke, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford D. Hyra
Clifford D. Hyra FRESH IP PLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DRIVE SUITE 2000RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cooking pots and pans, non-electric; Cooking utensils, non-electric, namely, grills; Non-electric Skillets; Grills in the nature of cooking utensils; Dutch ovens; Baking utensils, namely, baking mats, baking cups, spatulas and dough blenders; Baking sheets of common metal; Skillets; Griddles in the nature of non-electric cooking utensils; Roasting dishes; Deep fryers, non-electric; Cauldrons; Non-electric griddles; Baking dishes; Cooking pot sets; Pots; Dishes in the nature of household utensils; Gratin dishes; Basins in the nature of bowls; Dishes; drinking glasses, drinking vessels and barware, namely, seltzer bottles and cocktail shakers; Earthenware saucepans; Autoclaves, non-electric, for cooking; Casseroles dishes; Hot pots, not electrically heated; Tajines, non-electric; Cookware and tableware, namely, pots and pans, serving dishes and utensil holders except forks, knives and spoons; Spoon rests; Knife blocks and Carving boards; Barbeque tongs and forks; Basting spoons in the nature of cooking utensils; Spatulas for kitchen use; Spaghetti servers; Graters for kitchen use and garlic presses in the nature of kitchen utensils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |