USPTO serial 90357533
BALADNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BALADNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Baking-powder; Bread; Bulgur; Chocolate; Cocoa; Flour; Halva; Honey; Ice; Mustard; Pasta; Sugar; Tea; Chocolate chips; Chocolate sauce; Chocolate pastes; Chocolate powder; Chocolate syrups; Chocolate topped pretzels; Chocolate topping; Chocolate truffles; Chocolates and chocolate-based ready to eat candies and snacks; Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; Condiment, namely, pepper sauce; Honey mustard sauce; Honey substitutes; Ices and ice creams; Icing sugar; Icing mixes; Noodles; Sauces; Spices; Tea substitutes; Tea-based beverages; Yeast, baking powder; Baking spices; Brown sugar; Confectionery chips for baking; Confectionery made of sugar; Confectionery made of sugar substitutes; Confectionery, namely, candy and chocolate; Cooking sauces; Corn flour; Dried pasta; Fresh pasta; Fried noodles; Hot sauce; Hot chili pepper sauce; Pita chips; Pretzel chips; Raw sugar; Rice dumplings dressed with sweet bean jam (ankoro); Rice noodles; Rice, pasta and noodles; Spaghetti sauce; Sriracha hot chili sauce; Starch noodles; Taco chips; Tapioca flour; Tartar sauce; Tomato sauce; Tomato-based sauces; Tortilla chips; Water ice; White chocolate chips; White sugar; Wonton chips; Worcestershire sauce; Yellow tea | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
| 032 | Fruit juice; Fruit juice beverages; Fruit juice bases; Fruit juices; Fruit-based beverages; Lemon juice for use in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee; Non-alcoholic beverages flavored with tea; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic beer flavored beverages; Non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic dried fruit beverages; Non-alcoholic soda beverages flavoured with tea; Non-alcoholic water-based beverages; Non-carbonated, non-alcoholic frozen flavored beverages; Orange juice beverages; Scented water for making beverages; Sherbet beverages; Syrups for making whey-based beverages; Tomato juice beverages; Tomato juice; Water beverages | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
| 035 | Online retail grocery store services; Retail grocery store services; Retail grocery stores | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOPTAN EVI IÇ VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by BALADNA HOLDING GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BALADNA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2021 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |