USPTO serial 90358149
MAJESTIC MANGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIURPITA, DREW PETER FISHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAJESTIC MANGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH R. CRUSE, JR.
Joseph R. Cruse, Jr. LAW OFC OF JR CRUSE30423 CANWOOD STSUITE 214AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ice cream infused with alcohol; Sorbet infused with alcohol | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 30, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |